http://nickhamilton.transworld.net/2009/04/15/how-much-photoshop-is-too-much-photoshop/ Snow Photo talk on transworld.net Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:44:25 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 http://nickhamilton.transworld.net/2009/04/15/how-much-photoshop-is-too-much-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-31690 CerBemncymn Thu, 03 Sep 2009 23:02:39 +0000 http://nickhamilton.transworld.net/?p=163#comment-31690 NeotoparJar <a href="http://avssedvvvssk.com" rel="nofollow">afpg</a> endorcedync <a href="http://avsekisjk.com" rel="nofollow">Bp5f</a> NeotoparJar
afpg
endorcedync
Bp5f

]]> http://nickhamilton.transworld.net/2009/04/15/how-much-photoshop-is-too-much-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-9246 Joey Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:31:13 +0000 http://nickhamilton.transworld.net/?p=163#comment-9246 RAW format HAS to be photoshopped. How MUCH you do in the camera RAW dialogue is another discussion, but photoshopping is essential. Learn about RAW, plz. RAW format HAS to be photoshopped. How MUCH you do in the camera RAW dialogue is another discussion, but photoshopping is essential. Learn about RAW, plz.

]]> http://nickhamilton.transworld.net/2009/04/15/how-much-photoshop-is-too-much-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-1097 nickhamilton Sun, 17 May 2009 03:45:38 +0000 http://nickhamilton.transworld.net/?p=163#comment-1097 THe ones above are Photoshopped and ones below are the original RAW files THe ones above are Photoshopped and ones below are the original RAW files

]]> http://nickhamilton.transworld.net/2009/04/15/how-much-photoshop-is-too-much-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-1096 elijahismyusername Fri, 15 May 2009 16:36:33 +0000 http://nickhamilton.transworld.net/?p=163#comment-1096 im confused on witch one is the accual photo...is it the bottom one? and the top one photoshoped? or vica verca? im confused on witch one is the accual photo…is it the bottom one? and the top one photoshoped? or vica verca?

]]> http://nickhamilton.transworld.net/2009/04/15/how-much-photoshop-is-too-much-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-1094 lil Sat, 02 May 2009 16:34:11 +0000 http://nickhamilton.transworld.net/?p=163#comment-1094 it is a lot of photoshop, but he hasn't altered the scene, or manipulated the actual image. lots of contrast boosting, levels, curves, etc... but he didn't compromise the actual integrity of the image or anything. its no Brian Walski "oops" though. see story here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/essays/vanRiper/030409.htm it is a lot of photoshop, but he hasn’t altered the scene, or manipulated the actual image. lots of contrast boosting, levels, curves, etc… but he didn’t compromise the actual integrity of the image or anything. its no Brian Walski “oops” though.
see story here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/essays/vanRiper/030409.htm

]]>